Get exclusive CAP network offers from top brands

View CAP Offers

CPA or revshare

[bsa_pro_ad_space id=2]
  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #664460
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I’m just a rookie, but to me it depends on the site. How long will the site keep a player before they look elsewhere. For sites like Party, Paradise and Ultimate Bet I want revshare because I feel they do a fairly good job keeping players. For a site like Pacific I would only do CPA because I think the players don’t stay for very long.

    #664474
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Cmos
    I agree with Pokermonger about Paradise anyway (I can’t comment on the rest).

    In the end you will make more money on revenue share with us, however, this can be a long process. You also need a stroke of luck in bringing in a gib player.

    Stephen

    #664492
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I think it depends on your player, if you think most of them are one time pkayer, you should choose CPA commission of course

    #664494
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    It depends on a number of things, but mostly what type of players are you sending, and what site are you sending them too. If your sending players from a freerolls site, or a site that teaches the basics of poker – CPA is probably your best best (since the players you send are probably pretty poor). If your sending high calibre players – you would probably make more money of rev share. Sites where “cash games” are big, such as Party are obviously rev share candidates. Other sites are generally better CPA candidates, such as sites like Pacific who only allow one table to be played at a time (meaning less rake is taken per hour from most players then at other sites)

    #664497
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I tend to make the assumption (whether right or wrong) that over time a larger and larger number of players will stick at whichever poker site they have chosed. While it may seem a blanket statement, and I agree with many of the points above, my preference would be for revenue share.

    #664508
    vladcizsol
    Member

    Revenue Share for me. If the room DOESNT retain enough of my players to make it profitable I drop the poker room.

    #664510
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Revshare any day, in casinos. Just one whale can be worth hundreds of CPA players.

    In bingo I like a combination, since players often take a long time to convert.

    Poker sites that also offer rake back are better done on CPA since you are very likely to lose your player soon if you don’t also offer rakeback.

    If the rakeback trend continues the way it is going now, Poker may well be best kept at CPA only.

    #664535
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Which poker sites allow rakeback?

    #664542
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Ultimate Bet, Absolute Poker, Interpoker, Caribbean Sun Poker do, AFAIK.

    #664543
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    To add to Randy’s list, it is available at the following rooms also, but I don’t know if they suport it.

    Gaming Club, Eurobet, Empire, Pokerplex, Fulltilt, Royal Vegas, 7 Sultans, River Belle, Lucky Nugget, Intertops as well as some other smaller rooms.

    It is not an encouraging list.

    #665328
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Yes Revenue Share for us also :clapper:

    #665359
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I use to be CPA but after reading this thread I have changed all my programs to rev except for pacific

    #665586
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    In the long time it is better revshare. :hithead:

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)