- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
come on guys
In the long run revenueshare will pay out higher, but in the beginning CPA will bring in more money.
That’s what is true for me in casino, poker not so much.
I guess if you do rakeback revenueshare is ok, but if you don’t, I think CPA is likely better.
In my experience it’s almost impossible to do well on revshare if you just do bonuses. You can attract players, educate them, get them playing and as soon as they get any good they move over to rakeback and you wasted your time. :hattip:
@Dominique 205105 wrote:
That’s what is true for me in casino, poker not so much.
I guess if you do rakeback revenueshare is ok, but if you don’t, I think CPA is likely better.
In my experience it’s almost impossible to do well on revshare if you just do bonuses. You can attract players, educate them, get them playing and as soon as they get any good they move over to rakeback and you wasted your time. :hattip:
Totally agree on this one.
For the casino revshare option is the best one. However, poker is a little bit tricky. I will add that it also depends on your players skills. I have seen players in my stats that deposited thousands, but my revshare part was only a few bucks. They lost it in minutes.
