- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 18, 2006 at 5:38 pm #689073
Anonymous
InactiveThat is a sound decision.
I am glad to hear it.
This business model is just a pain in the axx for everyone. (including moderators who have to deal with complaints launched by fraudsters).
Good going!
April 18, 2006 at 8:44 pm #689089Anonymous
InactiveYes – it is a good decision.
But it’s too easy to tar affiliate fraud as the resason. Perhaps you should be validating and vetting affiliates BEFORE they join anyway?
The reality is that it is customer behaviour (bonus hunting) that you are complaining about and that will remain under a rev-share model too.
:popcorn:April 19, 2006 at 1:14 pm #689160Anonymous
InactiveNot screening affiliates to the bone upon sign up is a choice VIP Profits has made in the past and with good reasons, which I will not go into now.
This has nothing to do with bonus hunting players, but affiliates that are abusing the CPA model intentionally! I am talking about over 50 “affiliates” here;
Bonus hunting is not necessarily done with bad intent. This is a known phenomenon.
THowever, thEse guys are cheating and stealing from us and that is criminal behavior!This is not possible under a rev share model.
April 19, 2006 at 2:44 pm #689170Anonymous
InactiveI now exactly what you are talking about, Mario.
It is best not to get too explicit so not to put ideas in some people’s heads.
-
AuthorPosts