Get exclusive CAP network offers from top brands

View CAP Offers

Cloaking Aff Links

[bsa_pro_ad_space id=2]
  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #693768
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    Bonusgeek wrote:
    so doing what I have described above, would that constitute cloakingNo, that is not cloaking. Cloaking is where you show the search engines a page that is different from what your human visitors see. Example — You might show human visitors a trashy 888 landing page, while showing the search engines a keyword-rich page of stolen, scraped content.

    What you are doing with your links is fine; this is how many people track the number of clicks on each link. There are multiple ways to do this; using a 301 redirect is a good, safe method. (That is what I use).

    #693773
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks for the clarification Dave.

    #693822
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I;ve been trying to set this up as well. I’ve got html pages set up with a 301 redirect on them and that all seems to work fine.

    The trouble i’m having is that it doesn’t register the page as being viewed in statcounter. I think the redirect is taking effect before the statcounter code kicks in to count the hit? Is there any way to show these as half the reason i wanted to set the redirect pages up was to count my exit links.

    Cheers

    Arn

    #693927
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I wish I could help ya Arnold.

    #693935
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    arnoldpalmer wrote:
    I;ve been trying to set this up as well. I’ve got html pages set up with a 301 redirect on them and that all seems to work fine.

    The trouble i’m having is that it doesn’t register the page as being viewed in statcounter. I think the redirect is taking effect before the statcounter code kicks in to count the hit? Is there any way to show these as half the reason i wanted to set the redirect pages up was to count my exit links.

    Cheers

    Arn

    Send Simmo! a PM, he is a whizz at doing stuff like this.

    #693942
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    Quote:
    You might show human visitors a trashy 888 landing page, while showing the search engines a keyword-rich page of stolen, scraped content.

    :D LOL – I’ve really laughed a lot…

    #693977
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Its not cloaking, but wether or not the search engines will think its alright will depend on how you do the redirect.

    google has a hardon for what they call “sneaky” redirects.

    Make sure that the user is aware that they are being redirected to a new page.

    #694192
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    lots0 wrote:
    Its not cloaking, but wether or not the search engines will think its alright will depend on how you do the redirect.

    google has a hardon for what they call “sneaky” redirects.

    Make sure that the user is aware that they are being redirected to a new page.

    To ensure your inocent redirect is not taken as something else, make sure you use a 301 permanent redirect as oposed to a 302 (temporarily). You may also want to make that page unaccesable to SEs, you can do this by blocking them through your robots.txt.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)