- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 31, 2006 at 12:41 am #693768
Anonymous
InactiveBonusgeek wrote:so doing what I have described above, would that constitute cloakingNo, that is not cloaking. Cloaking is where you show the search engines a page that is different from what your human visitors see. Example — You might show human visitors a trashy 888 landing page, while showing the search engines a keyword-rich page of stolen, scraped content.What you are doing with your links is fine; this is how many people track the number of clicks on each link. There are multiple ways to do this; using a 301 redirect is a good, safe method. (That is what I use).
May 31, 2006 at 2:11 am #693773Anonymous
InactiveThanks for the clarification Dave.
May 31, 2006 at 7:59 am #693822Anonymous
InactiveI;ve been trying to set this up as well. I’ve got html pages set up with a 301 redirect on them and that all seems to work fine.
The trouble i’m having is that it doesn’t register the page as being viewed in statcounter. I think the redirect is taking effect before the statcounter code kicks in to count the hit? Is there any way to show these as half the reason i wanted to set the redirect pages up was to count my exit links.
Cheers
Arn
June 1, 2006 at 3:20 am #693927Anonymous
InactiveI wish I could help ya Arnold.
June 1, 2006 at 6:37 am #693935Anonymous
Inactivearnoldpalmer wrote:I;ve been trying to set this up as well. I’ve got html pages set up with a 301 redirect on them and that all seems to work fine.The trouble i’m having is that it doesn’t register the page as being viewed in statcounter. I think the redirect is taking effect before the statcounter code kicks in to count the hit? Is there any way to show these as half the reason i wanted to set the redirect pages up was to count my exit links.
Cheers
Arn
Send Simmo! a PM, he is a whizz at doing stuff like this.
June 1, 2006 at 9:21 am #693942Anonymous
InactiveQuote:You might show human visitors a trashy 888 landing page, while showing the search engines a keyword-rich page of stolen, scraped content.
LOL – I’ve really laughed a lot…June 1, 2006 at 4:17 pm #693977Anonymous
InactiveIts not cloaking, but wether or not the search engines will think its alright will depend on how you do the redirect.
google has a hardon for what they call “sneaky” redirects.
Make sure that the user is aware that they are being redirected to a new page.
June 2, 2006 at 6:12 pm #694192Anonymous
Inactivelots0 wrote:Its not cloaking, but wether or not the search engines will think its alright will depend on how you do the redirect.google has a hardon for what they call “sneaky” redirects.
Make sure that the user is aware that they are being redirected to a new page.
To ensure your inocent redirect is not taken as something else, make sure you use a 301 permanent redirect as oposed to a 302 (temporarily). You may also want to make that page unaccesable to SEs, you can do this by blocking them through your robots.txt.
-
AuthorPosts