- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 17, 2007 at 1:43 am #737100
Anonymous
InactiveI never heard about this after the mentioned April 27 press release.
I’m also not quite sure how to interpret this one.The money was originally frozen, and has now been seized instead? Does that mean permanently, or pending some legal proceedings? I think this was an ACH processor for many Microgamings, right?
May 17, 2007 at 2:42 am #737108Anonymous
InactiveIt was news to me too.
I also found the following press releases:
http://www.cnw.ca/fr/releases/archive/April2007/27/c2407.html
http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/March2006/22/c4874.html
May 17, 2007 at 12:19 pm #737141Anonymous
InactiveI never understood why they would have to seize funds (except as a scare tactic, of course). I would think that the records of transactions are all they truly need to infringe upon everyone’s rights.
May 17, 2007 at 1:07 pm #737146Anonymous
InactiveEven if temporary, adding millions to the coffers is always good PR for the DOJ.
In this case the $ belonged to merchant clients, so I think release may never happen.
Not the same as Neteller, where funds belong to a large extent to US citizens.
May 22, 2007 at 1:53 pm #737560
casinodaveMemberMany are not aware that this is directly tied to both the NETELLER & ECHO cases back in March.
The Citadel funds were also processed and held by ECHO ( like NETELLER ).
ECHO in a settlement agreement turned over funds to the DOJ.
The DOJ, then decided that indicting ECHO was “not in the publics best interest”
Read into the aforementioned as you wish.
DOJ documents may be read here FREE:
May 22, 2007 at 2:36 pm #737570Anonymous
InactiveThank you for this useful post.

-
AuthorPosts