- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
I may be coming from left field here, but those conditions seem to be a positive step – it’ll separate the bonus abusers from real players somewhat by requiring them to demonstrate a desire to play the games with money they deposit prior to receiving a bonus.
I don’t think a player who is genuinely more interested in playing at their casino would object – a bonus ‘whore’ certainly would.
Those are my initial and, perhaps, unenlightened, thoughts to these new requirements. Looking forward to hearing what others think.
Previously, players were required to wager their money x times before getting a bonus. Consequently, most players never got a bonus at all, not being able to meet wager requirements.
Now consider that other Microgaming casinos are now using the “EZ Bonus” system, where players have a much “player-friendly” system. Of the two options, which is more likely to sell?
If the idea is to get players to spend their money, they are more likely to do so, if they get to play longer, imv.
As a player, I’m a vip at a couple of VA casinos. The fact is, when I was offered a 100% bonus with these terms, I declined it. Why bother? If I win enough to meet the wager requirements, I might as well go ahead and cash out my winnings, with no restrictions. There is no incentive for me to give them my money, as compared to another casino who offered me a 100% bonus, a casino with the EZ Bonus.
