- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 12, 2006 at 7:00 pm #705770
Anonymous
InactiveI received about 4 emails this morning for 21 Magic, unsolicited, and unknown.
And I’m not a big Tropez fan at all anyway.
September 13, 2006 at 10:32 am #705851Anonymous
InactiveFrickin hell I got tons of them as well. Seems like my decision to write a little rogue post was wise.
September 14, 2006 at 12:20 am #705933Anonymous
Inactive— I’ve removed this comment, pending judgement on how this investigation turns out —
September 14, 2006 at 8:35 am #705958Anonymous
InactiveI was hitted by the spam as much as you guys did. I looked at the screeshot, asked our tech team to look at it. Some of the network services that are used by our casinos are managed by playtech. What you saw is an example of it. I wouldn’t be suprised if you were finding more casinos, not necessarly related to our client’s brands, using the same services/servers.
I can assure you that the brand isn’t ours and isn’t related to our clients in any shape or form.
Now, i’m not going to fight with you as you seem to be pretty certain of what you think.
Laurent
September 14, 2006 at 9:17 am #705960Anonymous
InactiveLaurent,
If you’re saying that this latest wave of spam isn’t anything to do with Casino Partners, then do you have any idea who it *is* connected with?
September 14, 2006 at 11:48 am #705973Anonymous
InactiveNo idea. I know that til now the spam was sent to ambercoast which i think is associated with casino pays, but this one is new.
September 14, 2006 at 1:52 pm #705994Anonymous
Inactiveok. I’m quite interested in how they could use your SSL Cert (Casino Tropez, as shown) without your request (as that is NOT how SSL Certs work).
However – I will look furthur into the Playtech end of things when I return and I appreciate your quick response.
September 14, 2006 at 2:03 pm #705997Anonymous
InactiveI find relying on some of your tech teams for giving insight is not always a good thing. Some of us on this board are highly technical and I believe Kwblue has a valid point worth answering.
But perhaps this should wait until the CAC is finished. greek39/
September 14, 2006 at 5:04 pm #706040Anonymous
InactiveWe’re a 400+ people organisation spreaded in several countries. Finding out what services are running on that server or who manages the server isn’t so easy, especially when this service is being managed by our software provider.
We’re looking into it, and making sure this casino and any other casinos aren’t using any of the resources that are supposed to be dedicated to us, but then it might not be 100% our call as it’s a service provided by our supplier.
Anyway, I’ll be back here with more info.
LaurentSeptember 14, 2006 at 6:05 pm #706057Anonymous
InactiveI appreciate the help. Maybe between the two of us, we can figure out what is going on here.
September 14, 2006 at 11:56 pm #706079Anonymous
InactiveThank you laurent communication is always appreciated.
greek39
September 16, 2006 at 2:03 am #706181Anonymous
InactiveLaurent, perhaps you might have a bit more success in contacting Playtech and trying to their help, than the affiliates such as Fictionnet, who haven’t had any luck with them. At the end of the day it appears you are being dragged into this sorry mess because of a common software provider and there is a risk to the Casino Partners name.
September 17, 2006 at 8:29 am #706268Anonymous
InactiveI agree.
Status is that we complained, giving them ton of spam emails received through the company. Obviously they can’t give me any names/companies, but i understood they’re very pissed off and they might pull the plug.I’ll keep updating you…
LaurentSeptember 17, 2006 at 4:56 pm #706306Anonymous
InactiveThis is excellent news, Laurent.
Looks like this sunday morning is bringing loots of positive news for a change. :colgate:
September 23, 2006 at 3:25 am #707071Anonymous
InactiveLaurent, did you you ever hear any more from Playtech about what they were going to do about this? On the plus side, I think the spam may have finally come to an end (or a pause, at least).
-
AuthorPosts