Get exclusive CAP network offers from top brands

View CAP Offers

Casino CEO sees chance for Internet gambling

[bsa_pro_ad_space id=2]
  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 3 posts - 16 through 18 (of 18 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #716068
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Nobody’s mentioned that there would still be 11 states where gambling online is illegal.

    Does anyone think that those states will fall in line if the federal level laws change. According to everything I’ve read on this subject, state takes precedence over federal – so?

    I think it’s true that if federal legalizes the US biggies may not start with affiliate programs. However, there will still be the competition from offshore – many of whom will jump back in with reinstated affiliate programs and established traffic. There will surely be some pressure there.

    There’s an article posted here somewhere that states that if the US continues to be in defiance of WTO rulings, it’s possible that Antigua (and probably many others) could really upset the entertainment industry by issuing name CDs/DVDs/souvenirs since this stuff works both ways and there would be no copyright involved. I wonder what this powerful group would do then…

    Boggles the mind :)

    ntaus

    #716080
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    Quote:
    Nobody’s mentioned that there would still be 11 states where gambling online is illegal.

    Does anyone think that those states will fall in line if the federal level laws change. According to everything I’ve read on this subject, state takes precedence over federal – so?

    What would likely happen is that the federal government, if it changes direction, would draft a general set of guidelines to cover situations where states aren’t already regulating gambling (very few) – and ultimately it would end up being each state deciding whether or not they will allow it. There would also likely be a federal levy or duty on all wagering, plus individual state taxes if that state allows gambling.

    Because of the levy, they would probably let the tax reporting slide. It does not make sense for them to require each casino to report a $1200 win like they do in the land based casinos, just so that the gambler can be taxed – the gambler is ultimately responsible for reporting his own taxes anyhow. By collecting from each licensed operation, their chances of collecting the revenues increase significantly anyhow.

    #716083
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I doubt most states would turn down the chance of added revenues.

Viewing 3 posts - 16 through 18 (of 18 total)