Get exclusive CAP network offers from top brands

View CAP Offers

Cake Poker Affiliates – Big Problem

[bsa_pro_ad_space id=2]
  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 2 posts - 16 through 17 (of 17 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #806662
    FelixtheCat
    Member

    @Renee 213710 wrote:

    The business partnership can’t just be there when one side wants it.

    No but that’s why I think partners should share the revenue and the fraud costs. I would get your point if you said that you do not charge the affiliate for payment processing and other costs directly generated by players brought to you by affiliates (but I actually do not know if you do or not as we don’t actively work together). As I said we got used to paying those in some partnerships and do not argue about it anymore.

    It has to be there all the time and if that were more heavily enforced, I think we would probably see less groups screwing people over. Noone wants to work with someone who only plays by their own rules.. I think we can establish that as the truth.

    Yes, we can

    I can understand why you would think that, but take into consideration the other “costs” that go with being an operator…

    never in doubt!

    For revshare – no negative carryovers.. no bundling etc etc..

    Affiliates have been spoilt for years now, don’t whine ;)

    A player wins 40k on the last day of the month then drops it back on the first day of the following month… thats the operator paying the affiliate a commission on money that never came in from that player.

    Every time I think about this a shiver goes down my spine because I do agree with you that this is not fair but then again see my statement above…

    As I mentioned previously, where I can I take only the amount earned from the chargeback.. but I can absolutely see the side of the fence that would want to charge the whole cost of the chargeback.

    I guess there is no right or wrong here and all in all I do get your point.

    #806710
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @gamblingbutler 213767 wrote:

    No but that’s why I think partners should share the revenue and the fraud costs. I would get your point if you said that you do not charge the affiliate for payment processing and other costs directly generated by players brought to you by affiliates (but I actually do not know if you do or not as we don’t actively work together). As I said we got used to paying those in some partnerships and do not argue about it anymore.

    Our program doesn’t charge processing fees or progressive fees etc to the affiliate. What you see is what you get. The tiered revshare doesn’t pay commission on bonuses, but does not deduct any other fees from the commission. The wager model pays on both deposits and bonuses, no fees deducted.

    Anyhow, I think we may have hijacked the thread enough… I hope the original issue got resolved to everyone’s satisfaction.

    Cheers

Viewing 2 posts - 16 through 17 (of 17 total)