- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Perhaps because joining bonuses have been paid out to them which is greater than the rake so far ?
Hi There,
This can occur under many circumstances and I agree it’s a bit ambiguous so I don’t blame you for asking:
To clarify:
A betting player is defined as a player who places a bet during the day in question.
So in the case of poker … you can see a ‘betting player’ and no rake when they play in a freeroll.
When a player plays on such a small table limit that the pot isn’t raked – would have to be very small <$.5/1 in almost all cases. Also there are some abstract rules re: heads-up play where sometime the pot isn’t raked Hope that helps…
Hi All,
Just to comment on Pauls’ post. On the casino side, [this touches on the admin ratio’s metric we have] if your overall account is in a drastic state of way more admin given than deposits/purchase you could also see a betting player and no $$.
for example, player takes the $10 free at Zodiac or Lucky Emperor. Drops the $10 and leaves. Normally you’d still get a commission with us on that $10 … however, as Paul said … if your overall affiliate account (not specific to the player, so again any sizable account this would not happen to) has the ratio’s in a bad spot, then you would NOT see the $10 ( and resulting $3.50 in commission)
Cheers
