- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 18, 2008 at 10:57 am #765975
Anonymous
InactiveI think it’s ok for now, even though it could be clearer. They will never use it against an honest affiliate, I think!
April 20, 2008 at 6:46 am #766106Anonymous
Guest5 players is pretty high number.
I never consider a quota … aff friendly.
and i never consider something that is in the terms .. not being in the terms.
come on.
They could just as easily state in their terms … abitrage players will not be paid any aff income
as the only meaning I can take from their meaning by that … is they are trying to keep players from signing up as an aff in order to get a kickback on their own play.
and after writing that out …..man that seems weak.
I’d tread careful with any place that has terms which are not aff friendly and not trust what some rep from the program is saying (no offense to the reps) … but what ISN’T in the writing is just as important as what IS in the writing.
In this case the terms when held to the letter can be used against the aff … whether the intention at this time is meant that way or not, things change. …. why set yourself up for that?
April 23, 2008 at 10:54 am #766360
EkamudrjMemberHi Everybody,
First of all, thank you for your inputs regarding this. It’s always good to get different opinions.
We have decided to remove this minimum player rule and add another rule to the termination clause just as kwblue suggested.
This is the rule we added to the termination clause:
“We reserve the right to protect us against sportsbetting players taking advantage of our program. These players, often referred to as ”arbitrage” players, uses the affiliate program to their advantage by referring them self in order to get 30% commission from their own losses in the sportsbook. If we find evidence of such conduct, the agreement will be terminated with immediate effect.”
Once again I want to thank all of you for your inputs. As some of you comprehended this rule as predatory it was a no-brainer to remove it.
We are there for the affiliates just as much as the affiliates are there for us. And the same goes of course for the T/C’s.
If you have any comments please let me know.
Regards,
Rudi
Betsafe.comApril 23, 2008 at 11:04 am #766361Anonymous
InactiveGreat work Rudi and Betsafe!!! We affiliates really appreciate the change. I will send out the change notification when our system updates your terms later this afternoon (next scheduled run)
Thanks Again!
April 23, 2008 at 6:47 pm #766415Anonymous
InactiveMuch better, thanks!!
April 23, 2008 at 11:39 pm #766427Anonymous
InactiveThe term has, indeed came in as expected
The term now reads that this term applys only to ‘advantage affiliates’ who participate in arbitrage against the affiliate program.Essentially, if you try to rip off the affiliate program – they will not pay you your earnings.
Thank you for the update and the clarification
-
AuthorPosts