- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 1, 2005 at 12:57 pm #673658
vladcizsolMemberThe Bare Bones “off the shelf” RTG backends used by many of their licensees is pitiful. Equally bad is Boss Media’s included stats.
October 1, 2005 at 3:42 pm #673663Anonymous
InactiveBest: Brightshare (unfortunately IE only). WagerShare.
Worst: 32Red. All Boss Media.October 1, 2005 at 5:55 pm #673668Anonymous
InactiveI don’t like any of them, though many of them have made some nice improvements.
RTG – forget it, though at least it’s the same across the software. Playtech is a bit clunky and I don’t trust the tracking, but the stats aren’t bad.
Microgamings – I think each of us should send an email to MGS, or through your favorite operator, asking them to standardize their backend so that we can get consistency and better stats without having to worry about what each program has to work out to please their affiliates – and then the aff programs can concentrate on marketing rather than programming.
Boss – useless.
Most useful (to me) – Brightshare, even if it is the simplest of programs, because I can freetag my affcodes and thus not have to go and register a campaign each time.
October 3, 2005 at 4:17 pm #673718Anonymous
InactiveThey’re all pretty terrible. Either user unfriendly and unwieldy or they don’t offer the level of tracking you want. At a push, I’d say VipProfits backend is one of the best (but it’s hard work) and – for ease of use – the standard Parlay Entertainment bingo sites are good also.
The worst…all the RTG sites, the standard Playtech set up and mostly everyone else.
October 4, 2005 at 2:32 pm #673758Anonymous
InactiveSimmo! wrote:With CPS, which again looks good in IE, in Firefox you don’t get a navigation panel so its a one-pager.Looks like this is fixed
Nice one CPS. -
AuthorPosts