- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 4, 2006 at 2:52 pm #709547
Anonymous
InactiveOne thing I’ve been asked to clarify, no the contract is not cast in stone. If affiliates have ideas, concerns or “wants”, we’re more than happy to discuss.
Cheers
Simmo!
January 3, 2007 at 8:20 pm #720757Anonymous
InactiveGuys – this is a great idea. Luckily enough I’m UK based but would definietly have considered it if I was in the US. Lets face it – there is a good chance that it could all change in the next couple of years. :clapper:
January 3, 2007 at 9:12 pm #720763
biggygMemberI’m not one for reading legal documents , what is your cut of the profits?or will you charge flat rate?I think most USA affliates are probably looking into offshore bank accounts and shell accounts.It may be just better to move and I am sure some of the members making xx,xxx per month and still based in usa may just do that.
January 4, 2007 at 6:27 am #720819Anonymous
InactiveWhat they are mostly looking for would be getting links to their websites :shhh:
To me trying to take advantage of the community in such a way is a no-no :nono:
Trust me, if you are not making $100K+ a month the DOJ would not even spit on you, not to mention dealing with you legally.
January 4, 2007 at 5:08 pm #720891Anonymous
InactiveStupid wrote:What they are mostly looking for would be getting links to their websites :shhh:To me trying to take advantage of the community in such a way is a no-no :nono:
Yeah whatever. You may choose to do that but don’t tar us with the same brush please.
Buddy/CBG: We’ve put this plan on hold for the time being as we didn’t feel it was necessary. We thought if the DoJ was really that bothered they’d have taken some action on US affiliates by now
But if things get worse, it’s one to think about.
January 4, 2007 at 5:38 pm #720903Anonymous
InactiveDid you read your own T&C?
Additionally that they also agree to keep any web links that have been placed on sites by the Licensee (excluding affiliate links obviously!) with a view to assisting search rankings of other affiliates in the same situation.
If you get webmasters to sign-up under your progam – more power to you.
January 4, 2007 at 5:50 pm #720906
biggygMemberI personally would never go for such a thing and by no means do i say it is not a good idea.I am somewhat of a hands on control freak and been burned too many times I will never have another partner in anything except the two I have now. I would get myself a good lawyer to set up a company offshore and channel everything through it.I could also relocate a relative i dont like to one of these countries if i was making xxx,xxx a month from my websites ,that would be a win win situation .I am not american so dont really apply to me but who knows what the future will bring to Canada or UK the two countries I do hold citizenship.
January 4, 2007 at 5:55 pm #720908Anonymous
InactiveOh, UK will never ban online gambling – I can not imagine how much bet365 pays to have their ads running on entire stadiums. Not to mention the rest of the betting firms and casinos.
It may take a while for an american to get used to the coins though :laugh:
You know, NFL should make note of the money the team owners make from the banners around the field…
January 4, 2007 at 6:04 pm #720911Anonymous
InactiveStupid wrote:Did you read your own T&C?The idea behind that was so that we could cross-manage the sites and ensure rankings were maintained as best as we could for when/if the owner returned. As it quite clearly states in your quoted piece in fact. Plain common sense – not some underhand tactic as you seem to assume. Anyway it’s all irrelevant now as we’re not doing it

-
AuthorPosts