Get exclusive CAP network offers from top brands

View CAP Offers

AUDIT – ReferBack

[bsa_pro_ad_space id=2]
  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #692652
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Well, looks like these Buddy things all have the same problem.

    Perhaps Microgaming’s basic design at fault here?

    I know I recently received notice of another Microgaming group using this program – just can’t remember who it was right now.

    Perhaps Referback could ask Fortune for some input and both programs could cooperate to solve these tracking problems for the better of their affiliates.

    #692704
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Dom,

    There are many questions that have come from these two audits having similar outcomes, but I will discuss them with you and other board members before we proceed.

    This audit was the first of several non-member audits.

    #692742
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Very very g00d work J.Todd!!

    #692779
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thank you…

    Hope this is the start of something possitive =0)

    #692900
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hi J,

    Thank you for your feedback on the Belle Rock Buddy.

    I have just a moment ago received news from our office regarding your findings and you will be pleased to know that we are giving this issue the attention it deserves.

    Judith (from Miami) on behalf of the ReferBack Team

    #692917
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Judith,

    Thanks for the quick reply and attention, it’s greatly appreciated. I look forward to discussing this with you further, both here in Miami and afterward. =0)

    #693293
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hi there,

    Thank you all for your patience. The buddy was removed from the download bundle some time ago and should not have been available. Thank you for bringing these instances to our attention. We are in the process of making sure that all new downloads not contain the Belle Rock Buddy.

    We are assessing the impact of the Belle Rock Buddies tracking. We have established that it was tracking on the “visitor number” level. We now have to establish exactly how accounts were allocated. Once we have these findings we will take the next actions.

    Thank you
    Wayne

    #693298
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks for your swift action.

    We are looking forward to a speedy resolution.

    #693481
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Int, you’re the man!

    very nice job!

    I am currently 2 days into awaiting a reply from Intercasino to see why one of my testers didn’t register in their tracking. Will post the situation if it seems the problem is one that is universal. … that’s if they ever reply. (i’ve had problems getting a reply from them in the past).

    **********************

    Wayne.

    Well done by RB to address this situation in a timely and sincere fashion.

    I was very, very concerned when i first read this post. Now although still concerned, I am not rushing to take down RB’s links. :)

    please let us know what was the final conclusion in this matter and whether the buddy thing is going to continue to exist and ifso, some kind of assurance the problem has been fixed. *although you can bet your farm more testing will be done. :)

    #693482
    Anonymous
    Guest

    While I feel some what hypocritical for saying this because personally I don’t have any sponsors that the APCW has listed

    (although in my defense: I didn’t know they were listing RB – perhaps Int you should announce whenever another program is added to your audit list so that those of us who were previously not able to participate can be aware that upon your new added program, we can now perhaps have something to contribute). :)

    anyway with that said: I hasten to add/ask that everyone support the APCW as you can see where today it literally saved thousands, perhaps more, …

    #693555
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    bb1webs wrote:
    …perhaps Int you should announce whenever another program is added to your audit list so that those of us who were previously not able to participate can be aware that upon your new added program, we can now perhaps have something to contribute…

    Hey ya BB1! Long time no hear! :hehe:

    Thanks for the support and feedback. Let me address your question:

    As of March 2006, it has been APCW policy to audit whoever we choose… whether the program is a member or not. ReferBack has expressed a sincere interest in working with us on this issue and becoming a member. However, when this audit was conducted, they were not members.

    When we conduct audits on member programs, we let that program know the details of the audit prior to it’s public release. We give them time to investigate any problems and prepare a reply.

    When we conduct audits on non-member programs, we do not afford them this same courtesy.

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)