- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Actually we discussed this many times years ago. Quite a few of us had the impression that there was sort of a paycheck system where payments were just too consistent and had “pay em just what keeps em on board” charecteristics.
All of this was speculation mind you, but there was annecdotal data to support this idea. Unfortunately there was no proof and no one stepped forward with anything more then hunches. The conversation stopped at that and this is the first time I have seen it discussed again.
It almost seems too blatent to me in many programs, I cant believe hoe they all seem to average out month after month after month.. It sure beats falling though!
Quote:It sure beats falling though!That’s the same most of us came to and without proof what more could be done anyways?
I believe I see that too, especially with programs who think they have reached top exposure at a given site.
Once in a while it’s a good idea to move a static program to top exposure, and if you don’t see the results change appropriately, drop them way down and move one up that hasn’t gotten much exposure before but is reputable.
There is just no way to properly prove such things.
