- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
I am not an SEO master, but everything I have read says google and the other SE’s don’t even download images (like the Lynx browser) so I don’t think it would effect things one way or the other.
CBW
You could probably scale the image down to make it a little smaller in kbs.
^^ How can I do that? And shuld I do that? Or is most people able to dl it fast enough? Im downloading the page within seconds with 1Mbit connection…
Which website is it? I looked at both in your sig and they do load fast enough.
^^ Its none of them, its a new project
Post the image and I’ll tell you what I think. You might have to either sacrifice quality or size…
An image of 130K seems too big to me.
We publish using a similar technique … and generally can get images down to 25K-30K.
Try image compression software, limiting the number of colours, testing btoh GIF and JPEG formats.
You should be able to make siginificant reductions in size with no obvious reduction in image quality with a few tweaks.
sigh.gifI reduced it to 45k, you think its ok? Or shuld I reduce more?
I just want good quality on the picture…
I”d say 45K is three times better than 130K – well done.
:highflyerMost sites will pull in seperate images that add up to a lot more than that – so go with it and see what sort of feedback you get.
Post it here too – and we can tell you.
:shhh:Personally, mine is 500 BYTES, which is 0.5kb
AdioKing wrote:Personally, mine is 500 BYTES, which is 0.5kband I bet that it does not have the detailed background layout that is being attempted ..
:notify:Whats the total size of the graphics and code that you pull in to complete your layouts?
:hehe:
