Get exclusive CAP network offers from top brands

View CAP Offers

888.com granted Conditional Certification by CAP

[bsa_pro_ad_space id=2]
  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #704812
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    hum……….

    what does “encompass” mean?
    something like “include”?

    #704852
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    war wrote:
    Illegal or Unethical Affiliate Activity will NOT encompass any activity related to the algorithmic positioning on search engines as we cannot police how Google or any other search engine enforces their policies.

    Hi War

    Just to clarify, if the spammer/unethical affiliate is producing clear black-hat pages as were previously discovered and lead to the decertification in the first instance, how does this sit within that phrase?

    Cheers

    Simmo!

    #704876
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I think this is welcome news in the face of ever increasing BH utilization. I appreciate 888’s cleanup and it appears to be working. Excellent work!

    #704896
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    war wrote:
    Illegal or Unethical Affiliate Activity will NOT encompass any activity related to the algorithmic positioning on search engines as we cannot police how Google or any other search engine enforces their policies.

    I don’t understand what this means.

    #704898
    vladcizsol
    Member

    What they are trying to say is they dont want to be put in the position of SEO police.

    IE if people buy paid links or take part in three way link exchanges that violates Googles T&Cs so do you want 888 to ban that affiliate? If people keyword stuff their pages do they get banned? Etc…

    888 acknowledges that site scraping, content theft, google bowling and other obviously blackhat practices which ARE illegal and wont be permitted, but they dont want to get drawn into algorythemic seo policing.

    I agree with that stance.

    #704903
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    If that’s what that means, that’s cool.

    The phrasing of it is extremely broad, so it tripped me.

    #704905
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    PM sent ot War, With hesistation I agree.

    greek39

    #704907
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I welcome this move.

    #704908
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    Dominique wrote:
    If that’s what that means, that’s cool.

    The phrasing of it is extremely broad, so it tripped me.

    Same here – thats cool :) Still won’t be promoting them though – lol.

    #704911
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Still won’t be promoting them though – lol.

    Ditto :Nod:

    #704912
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Well, I am relatively new here (to this board anyway) and this seems like an amazing piece of influencing. David vs Goliath. But give 888 credit where credit’s due- they are engaging with the webmaster community.

    Which brings me around to asking now that they are back in the fold- what does everyone recommend promoting 888 wise- the rev share or the bounty payment. I hear on the grapevine that 888’s conversions are good, but that their retention is not the longest. The million dollar question, I know, but would be interested in any thoughts.

    Online Casino Gambling

    #704924
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hi Rach,

    To be honest if I were you I would see how things unfold with 888. There are many good programs you can start promoting and hit the ground running with.

    #704928
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I have them on probation also.

    #704941
    vladcizsol
    Member

    Rach we ALWAYS recommend Net Rev…

    Always…

    CPA is terrible when it comes to casinos

    #704964
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    OK, well if the Prof says rev share then rev share it is. Thks for everyone’s help on this, I will also bear in mind Webzcas’ suggestion to sit on the fence for a wee while – he seems to know his golden geese from his turkeys

    Online Casino Gambling

    Link Partnership? Yes please. Send me a PM.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)