- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 21, 2006 at 10:27 pm #716450
Anonymous
InactiveRedirects can also be triggered by google bots that are scanning your site.
They’ll visit all the URLs and go through and if you are counting on your own webstats you’ll have no way of telling.
It would be great if you could get “industry ratios” for
– Clicks -> downloads
– Downloads -> registrations
– Registrations -> depositsBut it seems to vary greatly between affiliates, and also each affiliate varies quite a bit between properties. So I’ll watch this thread with interest.
For my own stats :
– Clicks to registrations varies a lot (perhaps I have bots too?)
– But I get nearly 50% of registrations turning into depositing players at most sites.
( Casino / Poker / Sports – all seems to be similar )Hope that helps a wee bit.
November 21, 2006 at 10:51 pm #716454Anonymous
InactiveI think if we get enough webmasters to respond we would get a significant sample size in order to make some very basic assumptions with about a +-10% variance.
If we had the Prof and Dom add their numbers together I am sure we would get well over 10,000 redirects in 1 month. If we could get 100,000 redirects in 1 month with 500 real money depositing player, then we could say that a webmaster should get 1 real money player for every 200 potential customers that are sent to various casinos.
In my situation, I would take the 200 players ratio and calculate that I should be getting 5 real money players. If I am getting 1 customer, I would then look at my advertising campaigns in order to weed out the bad advertising.
I would probably check my stats over 3 months in order to get a sample size I am comfortable with.November 21, 2006 at 10:59 pm #716457Anonymous
InactiveTheGooner wrote:Redirects can also be triggered by google bots that are scanning your site.I have excellent and very detailed redirect statistics. I can associate over 98% of my redirect traffic to SE searches, PPC, etc. I exclude all bot redirects automatically. My information comes from the server web logs which are the most accurate form of tracking. I used to use redirect counters, however I found them to be extremely unreliable.
I also spot check surfers that go to multiple sites, I check their times between clicking on various redirects in order to make sure there are no obvious patters or “click” fraud types situations. I get very suspicious of surfers that visit and click a redirect within 10 secs.
November 21, 2006 at 11:04 pm #716459Anonymous
InactiveWell thats much better stats than me mate.
I get 1.2m to 1.3m page hits a month on the main site – and cannot track to that level …
I have to resort to the client stats that give me clicks.
As I say clicks to registrations varies tremendously.
registrations to deposits seems a much more constant metric.November 21, 2006 at 11:44 pm #716463Anonymous
InactiveI´m not entirely sure what you mean by redirects but it sounds like that´s the same as clicks. I got about 2500 clicks to one of the big programs here in the last three months and only had a small number of downloads and no deposits at all.
I´m in the process of removing them from my site, I must add.
November 22, 2006 at 12:17 am #716469Anonymous
InactiveYes, redirect hits are clicks. I have about 5000 unique visitors, for 1000 clicks. I think that is very good. Over 1 million page hits a month is out of my league, a way for me to go yet.
I guess it would be better to take about 3 of the higher conversion programs (click to deposit conversion) so webmasters can see if the traffic they are sending is the right type of traffic or maybe its best to contact a few affiliate programs directly?
I don’t mind which way I get the information, I just feel I need some type of yard stick in order to measure my marketing success of failure.
November 22, 2006 at 12:20 am #716470Anonymous
InactiveI think Wagershare would be a good candidate for statistics as they have an excellent breakdown of information. I’ll dig up my stats and start this, unless it gets shot down by Prof or Dom due to some type of Affiliate program conflict.
November 22, 2006 at 1:46 am #716478Anonymous
InactiveI have wagershare numbers too – I’ll go and get them.
:drunk2:November 22, 2006 at 1:54 am #716479Anonymous
InactiveThis month.
Unique Visits : 663
Downloads : 125
New Guest : 20
New Real : 25
New purchase : 10November 22, 2006 at 2:02 am #716480Anonymous
InactiveSorry sir, I meant Reward Affiliates.
Clicks Downloads Register Players
(92 Days) 222 29 19 5November 22, 2006 at 2:08 am #716483Anonymous
InactiveThis month (WagerShare).
Unique Visits : 51
Downloads : 8
New Guest : 1
New Real : 2
New purchase : 1So far it is every 66 visitors you get 1 new purchase.
lets get some more, stats.
BTW, “All blacks” suck, Boks rule :tounge2:
November 22, 2006 at 2:08 am #716484Anonymous
InactiveI have rewards affiliates too – started last month.
Where do we find the summary stats?Here are the November figures – 21 days.
Clicks : 269
Downloads : 29
Registrations : 36
Betting : 10November 22, 2006 at 2:10 am #716485Anonymous
InactiveLast line of mthy rept
November 22, 2006 at 2:12 am #716486Anonymous
InactiveNobluff wrote:This month (WagerShare).
BTW, “All blacks” suck, Boks rule :tounge2:By suck – you must mean travel around the world winning test matches.
By rule – you must mean lose quite often.
– lost to Ireland,
– lost to England,
– and don’t even start me on the recent Boks record here in New Zealand …
:tounge2:Nice to meet you though mate.
:cheers:November 22, 2006 at 2:24 am #716487Anonymous
InactiveLol, in Canada now, don’t really follow it that much, Ill take your word about the recent record, whether it be losing matches or biting opponents. :sigh.gif :
Very nice stats btw, unfortunatly my player only deposited ~$40.
-
AuthorPosts