- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
7 Sultans
Royal Vegas
Blackjack Ballroom
Platinum Play
Vegas Slots
Lucky Nugget
Colosseum
Fortune Room
Jackpot City
BreakAway & Cool Cat ( do about same and both have a very good conversion ratio )BreakAway & Cool Cat ( do about same and both have a very good conversion ratio )
Hummm, I think I have to remove the $25 and $75 no deposit promotion from these 2. I have a very good conversion too, but conversion of clicks into bonus players. :hmmm:
sharpgambler wrote:Hummm, I think I have to remove the $25 and $75 no deposit promotion from these 2. I have a very good conversion too, but conversion of clicks into bonus players. :hmmm:I’m in the same boat..lots of clicks and player signups for coolcats 75 but very minimal depositing players.
WagerShare (Huge Whales)
Roxy
Fortune Affiliates (Platinum Play & Royal Vegas)
ReferSpotMicrogaming rule with over 95% of profits and I gave a shot to everyone – no one compares to them
Playtech – You send 20 depositors a month and then next month only 1 is coming back to play…
RTG – Players are always winning / Stats contain bonus credits for locked accounts
Crypto – Worst Conversions
Boss Media – Small players & always winning
Grand Bay
Casino Classic
Showdown
Bella Vegas
Jupiter
Glbobal Player
iNetBet
Bingo CafeMicrogaming casinos are the best for player retention and revenues.
These are the 3 best with no comparison:
1) Intercasino (You get keep whales)They might start slow but intercasino have the best long time conversion of any casino we have promoted and we still have huge players playing from 3 years ago.
2) Referback ( Good conversions)
3) Vegas Lucky (Huge whales)
:rollover: :colgate: :colgate:
who is Vegas Lucky? is that the name of the casino, or the aff program?
thanks in advance
S.
RtG…
xhtttp:http://www.vegaslucky.com
From my experience.
Microgaming is the hands down winner for highest player value. Some of my historically top performing casinos have been captain cooks, spin palace, music hall, colosseum casino.
Playtech seems to convert players a lot better than microgaming but the player value and player retention are not quite as high. Golden Palace is my pick out of this bunch.
I also like Slot Land and party poker for poker.
The list of who I dislike would be a lot bigger.
software is probably less important in th scheme of things than being up-front IMHO.
I have mixed feelings about that statement.
I totally agree that management’s decisions does go a long, long way towards player retention and conversions; I think that the software definitely has a large impact too.
So lets concentrate on the positive; which is that I think we can agree that a good software run by competent management will outdo all pretenders to the throne.
and I think its ultra important too – to point out the third part of the recipe, which falls under policy.
I am finding out more and more that policy is made first; then executed by management; usually without any thought given to extenuating circumstances or even any kind of deviation allowed for the treatment of whales.
Which is incredibly stupid IMHO.
If you have a whale who has proven to lose say, …. $20,000 a month for a couple or three months in a row; and then one day he hits it big and wants to cash out, and he gives any kind of hint that he does not want to go thru the cashin faxback process, it would be extremely smart of the casino to heed the player’s lead and then take steps to ensure the player never reaches a point of frustration which might make them decide to play somewhere else.
I think part of the problem is that casinos are often run by people outside the US, while a large, large portion of the players are from the US. And the people outside; don’t realize that the ones from the US take “principal” very seriously.
It won’t matter to the player whether or not he/she has already had to meet the cashin requirements once to cashin, in regards as to whether they will go back and play at that casino again. It will be the “pricipal” of the matter that will be the deciding factor as to whether the player returns.
Especially the big players, simply because they are more accustomed than anybody to being treated in a manner pleasing to their cause; and not what might happen to be the most convenient to the seller (casino) at that current time.
I think a lot of casinos need to learn a little more about the people that play in their establishments because I imagine the scenario I have just put to you; happens a lot more than we may be aware.
Think about it. Any true gambler will tell you that if they were to be totally honest, that they would admit to you that its likely whatever amount it is they have won at an establishment, in the long run, they will more than give it back. (talking casino game players, not poker).
I gamble a bit and I would say the above is true. If I hit it big somewhere I will almost always think of that place first to gamble for a long time after the win.
Yet although we still see a large majority of big winners giving a good portion, if not all of their wins back to the casino; there is still IMHO way too many times we see where the player quit and obviously cashed-out since we had the amount deducted from our stats.
Why did that player suddenly stop playing there? Do you really believe that was the one rare type who not only has the self-control to make themselves walk away from a casino where they’d just won it big, …. but remember, to have won in the first place puts them in the rare category.
That’s asking a lot. It makes much more sense to think that what may have happened, is since the player cashed out and didn’t come back, that there must have been something happen to piss-off the player.
Principal. It matters to USA based players. If you try any kind of tactics to avoid paying a player, they will take it personally. trust me on that one.
