@AussieDave 248085 wrote:
(if I understand your question)
You’d think so, hey!
But IMHO people; myself included to a certain point, put up with crap.
As far as determining success this thread is a prime example.
An affiliate program has been busted cross marketing to players sent by affiliates with straight links and other dodgy practices. However a limited few will speak out against the program. Most continue to promote them. Not withstanding (those that shall not be named), defend their unethical actions.
However in this instance even with hard factual proof, Taylor now owns 35 online casinos. So it seems being crooked these days pays dividends.
In 2003 I commenced promoting a new casino (oyster gaming – Elka systems). Long story short, within a few months and numerous player complaints, the slots were tested and found to be rigged. A little bit of research later and I was fairly confident they had dubious Russian connections (if you get my drift).
Point is no one is infallible.
From then onwards I not only researched who I was partnering with but also if they were a new outfit, I would place them onsite for at least 6 months. Least to say I’m now down to a few major groups only. Players are paid, payments are generally on time month in month out. And, I’m dealing with professionally like minded people who understand my business needs.
So from what you are saying it seems that we agree…it is a matter of business decision…whom you cooperate with…and this is not only one sided it is mutual for both sides