@FictionNet 236533 wrote:
I am aware of Wagershare’s high roller policy. I’ve been hit with it a few times, but I’m always aware of it. I might not like it but I do know about it before I decide to promote them. As most casinos do not carry over any kind of negative balance, it might be worth looking at promoting an alternative brand.
I am coming off as very pro wagershare now I know.
But, instead of wagershare removing all no negative carryover, don´t you think this is a good and logical solution?
Player wins $200 000 k one month then the next month loses the $200k. You are on 40% and thus earn $80 000. The player won his fortune on the 28th and lost it on the 3rd. Is it fair to take $80k from wagershare or any other company for that matter when they earned nothing on said player?
To me, while, being able to earn said 80k would be amazing and I would love a program for it, it´s not that fair and illogical. I am amazed some companies still use no negative carryover for high revshare deals.
And the player does not get banned, simply stated. When he loses more than he has won you will earn revshare on it and it does not spread to any other wagershare casino or player.