@Renee 213710 wrote:
The business partnership can’t just be there when one side wants it.
No but that’s why I think partners should share the revenue and the fraud costs. I would get your point if you said that you do not charge the affiliate for payment processing and other costs directly generated by players brought to you by affiliates (but I actually do not know if you do or not as we don’t actively work together). As I said we got used to paying those in some partnerships and do not argue about it anymore.
It has to be there all the time and if that were more heavily enforced, I think we would probably see less groups screwing people over. Noone wants to work with someone who only plays by their own rules.. I think we can establish that as the truth.
Yes, we can
I can understand why you would think that, but take into consideration the other “costs” that go with being an operator…
never in doubt!
For revshare – no negative carryovers.. no bundling etc etc..
Affiliates have been spoilt for years now, don’t whine 
A player wins 40k on the last day of the month then drops it back on the first day of the following month… thats the operator paying the affiliate a commission on money that never came in from that player.
Every time I think about this a shiver goes down my spine because I do agree with you that this is not fair but then again see my statement above…
As I mentioned previously, where I can I take only the amount earned from the chargeback.. but I can absolutely see the side of the fence that would want to charge the whole cost of the chargeback.
I guess there is no right or wrong here and all in all I do get your point.