@Dominique 204198 wrote:
I still think thieves should be named and shamed. In this case though he didn’t steal from us but infringed on a program he works with – so it’s their call to name and shame, not ours. If Chipleader wants to publish his details, it’s their prerogative IMO.
Quite the opposite, this guy has been SCREWING LEGIT AFFILIATES by infringing copyright, TM’s etc to gain an unfair and ILLEGAL edge.
It’s our job to look out for ourselves. If I want to publish his details, I am 100% entitled to do so since the info is 100% public domain…
@alexpratt 204181 wrote:
I think even though its publically availaible a lot of “nutters” aren’t clever or logical enough to find it – the guy from RTR is cool with you PM’ing the affiliate manager or even posting it here its just the contact details which I can understand when you have a family etc and there unfortunately some oddities out there :3eyes: who are simply unbalanced
Alex and Dom, removing that info was ridiculous. WTF. If the info is A) available, and 
in the interests of affiliates to show it to prove a point, it should stay. The info was a non-residential POSTBOX. Even if it was a company address, removing it is not on imo.
What’s the REAL reason you removed the POBOX address please hmmm? maybe the fact that they have won a cap award or 2 in the past?.. I small some BULL****, I think…