@Professor 194692 wrote:
I dont think it’s malicious, It appears to be mistakes made by a new start up software company which did not catch eveything in internal testing. This is not uncommon.
5 out of 8 …
0 out of 8 …
Mistakes? Didn’t catch everything? FFS Did they catch anything ?
That’s about a 30% correct tagging rate (5/16)
:Cry:
I’m assuming that you are not creating onerous and tricky scenarios in your testing that involve cookie deletion or anything, or testing with cookie suppression – but simply trying to use people to start basic browsers and join up and play.
Someone has been sitting on the secrets of a big cash cow here – collecting an awful lot of players without affiliate tags at all ?! Surely any experienced affiliate program would have noticed this was way outside normal variation?
:sarcasm:
Frankly the huge acquisition rate without affiliate tags MUST have told Rome Casino – and every affiliate program using Top Casino software for that matter – that they were capturing far more players without tags than they expected !
How could this be overlooked by the programs? How could it not be spotted through software testing prior to launch? How could it not be raised by affiliate managers who never got the same signup rates?
The phrase “willfully negligent” is springing to mind – especially as the status quo results in more money in the operators pockets … either that or “technically incompetant”
Not to shoot the messenger here (CAP Audit Team) … so – thanks for this audit Professor – it’s just highlighted the issues with going with novice programs/software.
:hattip: