I want to add that John you have the numbers to tell the story … I do not.
So it may be that the current system in place is the best … but I lack the ability to find the logic in it and therefore question it.
If anything I think it can be improved upon by not letting the money leave the casino to such an extent that it is so far out of reach as to force such an intrusion as to having to deposit to play the money back.
I find it curious that as is: it never really asks the player to prove they can actually deposit before they can cashout … it is in fact in direct opposite … they have to cash out and then if they want to play further …….. then they prove they actually have a means to deposit … and if they actually have the ability … then they can re-deposit the $150 and play. If they cannot then they’re rewarded with $150 they were forced to cash out.
”””””””””””””””””
John I apologize because I now realize I approached this all wrong and in my posts made you feel like you had to defend something and in fact it should be approached as that we are partners and as such … seek to better what we already have … and that is my intention so please don’t feel you have to be defending anything.
* I am trying to improve upon this flaw in myself but it won’t happen over night. I’ve had a lot of years to polish and just become aware I need to change.