BTW: I”m on your side John. You guys do good … I do good.
I’m not always right. Might not be here. But you only stand to gain from such discussions so please don’t be feeling defensive.
And perhaps I”m not getting my point across. What I am trying to say is that its like you’re protecting that $150 max amount allowed to win … rather than leave it on the table and let the business of casino … take care of business. It looks rinky-dink as it is.
or maybe I am mistaken and not understanding. But as I understand it … if you have met play-thru requirements and have over $150 … then it would be fruitless, even stupid to continue playing. Is that correct John?
ifso. then I stand behind my theory.