Why can’t people discuss what they want? I happen to like controversial topics. That’s where we normally learn the most (disagreement). Things aren’t always peachy. We don’t always agree. But if we chase out members who speak up, we have no idea what we will be missing. I remember when the CAP lost Steve Badger from playwinningpoker.com because people thought he was negative. I learned a lot from that guy and was sad to seem him ejected. He shared a LOT.
I don’t think attacking Luigi is fair. I enjoy his posts, negative or not, and whether or not I agree with them. I think it takes nerve to say controversial things in this forum because of the way people react. — Luigi did not make any personal attacks. If we attack people for their opinions instead of simply disagreeing, people will be more hesitant to post out of fear they will be ostracized.
What’s wrong with good old fashion disagreement and discussion?