Well i always had it in for you chips, because my first domain was allfree.com.
I don’t enjoy your opinions, but i can keep reading, arguing. 
I’m not a huge bill clinton fan, i think he (like bush 1) wasted time at the start by not having a list of appointees to fill positions. I thought he blew his presidency over a blow job, when he could have admitted it day one, said he was sorry and moved on.
But he could do math, his economic team had a middle of the road approach that was good for many on wall street and our new favorite term, Main Street.
He and Gingrich somehow managed to do what was right and balance the budget and put us on a better financial footing. Bush came in claiming they were the only ones competant to run government. These guys are worse than the 3 stooges, these people think they’re the best in the world and their not best in the room. Cheney and Dumbsfeld and their refusal to listen to their generals is a prime example.
So let’s see if i get this right, Bill Clinton didn’t take the chance to try killing Bin Laden, so he sucks, but George Bush squandered a chance in Afghanistan in 2002 to get Bin Laden by focusing on Iraq, so he’s better than clinton? Because he really blew a real opportunity?