@playcasino1 174450 wrote:
Here’s an extract from an e-mail with the CR aff guys about 10 days ago :
ME : When u guys do cross marketing from casino to casino, do u carry the affiliate tag across as well? This has to be the case, no?
CR : For the cross marketing, the tag is not usually carried away. The reason is very simple – we have been in this industry for almost 10 years with 23 brands – so if we’d carry the affiliate tag, it would be very hard to find new players. You could be working and investing a lot with a player and then all your commissions would go to the first affiliate that found the player
ME : Based on the reasoning u provided re: carrying aff tags, I think its all the more reason to carry the tag.
CR : For the aff tags, what I want to say is that this player you just send to one of our casinos, may already be (but you don’t know it) the affiliate of another affiliate in one of our other casinos… so we’d have to take your commissions out…
what do you think now?
ME : I hear you… But still I don’t see the reasoning behind the whole thing. Other programs that I work with have a number of casinos in their group. If I send a player that has already signed up through another aff tag, then he doesn’t belong to me. This I accept.
CR : If you want we can talk about it over the phoneWe did have a chat and I asked whether other affiliates are ok with this (tags not carried through), the response I got was not a clear cut YES or NO, but it leaned more towards “yes”. Well I felt in that case, I was pretty much OK with it, but still not happy.
And then Ixian started this thread….:thumbsup::hattip:
bb1webs, u are correct! Based on the above, they did make it clear to me which I do appreciate. Thank you! However,the reasoning behind why they don’t carry the tags still doesn’t make sense to me! If other groups are able to, then i don’t see why they can’t
I sincerely hope they change this policy as I would still like to promote their group!
it’s utter nonsense filled with the AM spin.
what do you think now?