@justbookies 167366 wrote:
I have a suggestion. It is a compromise and compromises tend to suit nobody. But I really think this will solve the problem for Bet365 and ensure they retain affiliates caught in the ‘negative equity’ trap. Why not zero negatives that exist at the end of every quarter? i.e at the end of March, June, September, December.
This is also a good idea – and seems to be a variant on the informal work Andy is doing right now. It would be best if it was written into the T&C’s though.
:hattip:
Although being fair if this quarterly insurance is offered then it affects Bet365’s bottom line – so sites taking this “insurance option” may also get a lower upfront percentage?