I Just Need to add one Last Point to This to Show you that Single Sign on is Not that Bad for Affiliates and we are Not Stealing But beeing Rather Fair Take this Example.
1) Player signs Up on the 01 Jan 2007 via BV magazine to BV
2) Player then Goes to Affiliate A and downloads CGB on 22 Jan 2007
3) Player then Downloads a 3rd Casino from Affiliate B On the 1 March 2007
Then By all Rights You as the Affiliate Did No Marketing to Bring The player to Our Group we did this Via sending a Magazine to a Database we had Bought from a 3rd Party
WE would not have to Pay comm to Affiliate A or Affiliate B as we did all the Marketing and Bought The player In from our Own Marketing Campaigns and he signed up with us First Before going anf finding our Links on the Affiliate Sites
But we DO pay Comm on Players Like this and always will even though You as the AFF did No marketing to get the Player into Our Group we did that By sending the Magazine?
Should we not pay Comm on these players I think Not this is Fair so we will Pay even though The player belongs to us as we bought him in