This thread has gone nuts since I last looked. Geez.
Antoine pointed the following out much earlier in the thread:
1. Did you choose reward affiliates because they pay the wager share model versus the player loss model?
2. Are you getting players to visit the casino, to make the minimum deposit, play the minimum required under the terms and conditions, and then explaining to those players when they should cash out?
3. Are you assuming that even if the player cashes out the exact same amount they deposited that you will be earning money from the wager model?
4. Are your players playing at the casino because they are gamblers or are they trying to defraud the casino?
This is one of many scenarios of attempt to commit fraud. This one doesn’t work for obvious reasons.
There is no way I am going to explain other ways to do it, the ones that actually work. It has hurt mostly players a lot over the years. There used to be no wagering requirements. Now you practically have to be a lawyer to understand some of them, all because the casinos would like to continue offering bonuses to actual players but at the same time want to prevent fraud.
If you think that casinos do not get defrauded by well organized groups onn a regular basis, you are not thinking like a fraudster. And that’s a good thing.
It doesn’t change the facts though, both players and affiliates have suffered through a lot of weird T&Cs, all because of a few groups who manage again and again to defraud casinos and affiliate programs.
I expect aff programs to be available like any other business, nine to five on weekdays. Of course we are scattered all over the globe, so our times and weekends are not matching exactly.
Not sure how many times in the early phases of this thread the need for notification of account closure was mentioned and agreed upon, but it was several times by several people.
I am going to go back now and read this whole shebang to see if anything new was said, glancing at it I saw mostly repetition of the same stuff.