It seems to me that some sort of bonus whoring coupled with blackjack advantage play is being implied here. However I must say that the only scenario where that would make a “fraudulent business proposition” is where the affiliate is on CPA. Wagershare as practiced at RA would be very unlikely to work well for the fraudulent aff since he would need to have the planet’s 20 biggest blackjack highrollers who consistently beat the house. Moreover RA’s Wagershare model indeed pays jack for blackjack (couldn’t resist :tongue:).
So if this really is the assumption here I don’t think it could have really worked. Unless of course he is being suspected of another scheme.