Online Casino

[neophyte]

Bonusgeek wrote:

The point is Kundan is a very good friend of mine

Big deal.

Bonusgeek wrote:

no one wants to hear your gay little comments about how the design is no good because of a few simple errors that mean absolutely nothing when it comes to making money.

GAY COMMENTS? what the..? (I made constructive criticism. you are just an idiot Troll from what i can see).

Good html/xhtml is essential in maximising potential profits – since image alt-text (for example) is read by the s.engines, leaving it out affects your SEO, and therefore your rankings. sigh. anyway no more free lessons..

Buyer beware. I was pointing out the FACT that the your buddy’s design did not even comply with basic html guidelines as advocated by the world wide web consortium.. If your friend is so clueless as to whack out non-compliant websites to gullible suckers, good for him…

Bonusgeek wrote:

Its actually funny you commenting on his work. Your sites are the most boring unattractive sites I have seen.

like your opinion matters – we are talking about markup, not design.

Bonusgeek wrote:

Whats even more funny is I think you have a web design company. I wouldn’t pay 10 cents to let you do any work for me if the sites I in your sig are any indication of your skills. Oh, my mistake, they must be great moneymakers because they validate. CLUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELESS

I didn’t design most of em – however I OWN them.. and in fact a lot of them don’t validate – most are currently undergoing redesign and redevlopement so that they are 100% kosher – because they should be.

It is the duty of every “professional” developer to keep abreast of standards and embrace them. they are Standards for a reason.

p.s. you are clearly an idiot. :dafingers

:flamer: