Casino City wrote:
Living in the USA, with a site that is clearly marked as being operated by a US company, Casino City plans to continue the way we are. There is nothing in the legislation that changes the legality of anything we are doing.
If we were an operator, or a payment processor, it would be a different story.
Doesn’t mean I don’t have worries about the economic impact of what is going on – I do. But I’m not worried about any criminal liability.
Michael Corfman
Michael,
If you can, what is your basis for you skirting the issues ? Clearly, the bill makes references to links (hence, us affiliates) domiciled in the U.S. I realize that you are much larger than most of us, probably have a team of lawyers working on this, have been going toe-to-toe with the DOJ in the past, but what is your basis for getting around this ??
I know from your post on another board, that CPA is part of the equation.
Thanks in advance for any legal input that you can share.