HDaddy – if pacific’s purpose was to offer the ‘Don’t Pass’ line bet, then his strategy would be a one-liner:
“Always bet Don’t Pass”
However it is not. He provides a progressive betting strategy, uses quasi-science to explain it, and does everything possible to mislead the reader into believing he has found a winning strategy.
It uses phrases like
“[the software is] statistically vulnerable to this strategy” and
“Random sequence is not programmed in an internet casino. The software simply delivers winning percentage to the casino. This fact creates the vulnerability exploited by the system”
These are flat-out lies. There is no ‘vulnerability’. The software does not ‘simply deliver winning percentage’.
Do you not agree that these statements are designed to sell the system to the player? Don’t you think that the majority of players will think that they are getting some scientific, statistically tested system that will enable them to beat the house?
Isn’t therefore the whole thing a lie?
pacificsun – you’re still completely missing the point, and just digging yourself into a deeper hole. The point is simple: you are making up random stuff in order to portray your system as being beneficial to the player.
I will summarise one final time:
- Your progressive betting system does not alter the odds for the player at all
- You make several misleading and inaccurate statements which are designed to make the system appear profitable
- You use stats such as “62% wins at Inter Casino” which must be based on tiny sample sizes and therefore are misleading and designed to make the system appear profitable
- You think it is ok to mislead customers in order to make more money
- You know nothing about gambling and nothing about ethics
- Talking in all caps just makes you look even sillier.
Hope that’s clear.