Bonusgeek I totally agree with what you said and you even brought a couple of interesting points I haven’t though of. They just pushed the wagershare to hard for it not to be adding to there very own bottom line, I think they should have just added the wagershare earnings model to list of models you would like to be paid under. It doesn’t make sense to me why they had to completley remove the rev. share model when they still allow CPA???? If you can’t put everything together I don’t know how much easier I could give it to you. They still allow CPA but they just HAD to totally dissallow rev. share completley now why on earth would they do such a thing like that ehh??? Maybe because they spend less on the affiliate this way?? Just some food for thought everyone. I also have to agree that all skill games take is another point the affiliate will get a smaller cut on wagershare. All of the player mistakes that keep these games around in brick and mortar casinos are being just givin to the casino, while the affiliates get his comission based soley on the plan that all players will play PERFECT, yea right give me a break what gambler honestly plays by the book 100% of the time? If all players read books and played the best odds there wouldn’t be any need for an affiliate or a casino for that matter because there would not be any money left over. Skill games like 3 card and blackjack all rely almost entirely on player mistakes and with wagershare this effectively cut your earnings probably in half (just a quick estimate) because you are not getting paid for the player mistakes. When you have players that are wagering 100k in a session and they play terrible basic strategy these mistakes will add up VERY fast but the affiliate will not reap any of these benefits at all. Casino Rewards and FA if you want to push your silly wagershare that is fine but you should allow everyone to earn on the old model as well. When I signed up to casino rewards I signed up for the 35% rev. share for life, not to be transfered over to some earnings model that I did not wish to have, and no simply keeping the players that are old on rev share is not good enough, I signed up thinking I would always be on rev. share. Not whatever they feel like putting me on whenever it works out best for them, both affiliate and casino should work together to make everyone happy, simply keep the rev. share model open as an alternative earnings model and I will be happy.