Get exclusive CAP network offers from top brands

View CAP Offers

Reply To: RakeBack

[bsa_pro_ad_space id=2]
#683633
Anonymous
Inactive
mwack wrote:
I don’t believe that he claimed to have statistics on the matter, rather he was just stating that there are rumors (which I believe he COULD provide proof of) that it’s true, and that he personally (also could provide proof) has had an abnormal amount of bad beats at PP. Nowhere did he claim it was a fact.

It’s tomatoe, tomato. If he, or anyone, is going to make statements that the RNG is corrupt, or that there is an abnormal amount of bad beats or rewards to the fish, they should be backing up these statements with actual facts, that prove this theory. Otherwise, it just comes off as another fish whining about not being able to beat the bad players, and using the “rng is rigged” claim as an excuse. I don’t mean to sound harsh, but I see this stuff all the time on poker forums, and to see it on a board like this, with lots of new affiliates wanting to break into the industry etc. really frustrates me.

If I were to come in and say “I don’t promote any Microgaming sites. They’re all rigged against you” I should be expected to back up that statement yes? It’s the same thing here, especially because we’re talking about a CAP-Approved Affiliate. By making these claims about Party, it also reflects badly on CAP.