whether the above is true or not; enough people are talking about it. I know I can win other places but cannot at PP, and since I only play premium hands I expect to get my share and more of bad beats … but at PP its rediculous.
.
Sorry but this is just plain wrong to single out Party and say that the RNG favours weaker players. What statistics do you have to back up this fact and claim that the amount of bad beats you get is “rediculous”, and allude to it being paying off the bad players? Because there have been numerous done on the contrary, to prove that the RNGs for not just Party Poker, but many other sites are 100% fair. I have over 800,000 hands at Party Poker myself, and there is nothing abnormal about my statistics. This kind of comment is usually made by losing, break-even or barely winning players, who get frustrated at not being able to beat the “fish”, and blame it on the RNG. You’ll also hear this statement at pretty much any poker room you play at, and also on pretty much every internet poker forum, discussing any poker room, not just Party Poker. It’s just plain wrong.
You’re right, you may get more bad beats in normal at Party Poker, but that is due to the higher variance due to the worse players. If you have any statistical analyses to backup your statement then I’d like to see them, but I highly doubt you do.