It clearly states sharetherake.NET <
unless sharetherake.com has been trademarked or servicemarked – then this boils down to what we see every day in this industry!
As long as the .net is not representing itself as the .com then I see nothing wrong with this. In fact as long as they dont do that then every webmaster they acquire is a plus for the .com not a minus!
Sure the title might sound a bit misleading, but the description is not so as Lou stated if the worse they could be guilty of is taking advantage of a fool. Unethical? I guess to some extent it is, but nothing criminal.