I gotta disagree with you on that one Classics. IMO no matter what area of gambling it is; you still are going to get a much greater return on your dollar if you could make the beginners a winner.
but on the other hand I agree that it would be incredibly stupid to mess with such a large and prosperous business to make a few extra dollars, (well a lot more than a few, but in relative terms..) – but that said, I am always amazed that some programs choose to cheat us when I know they’d make so much more by being fair because of how many of us would switch our attention in that direction. Yet they go on and on with their transparent ways and therefore will never reach their full potential. (and largely this type of behavior is trasparent but in a way that we cannot put our finger on the button as being undeniable proof, yet we know the place isn’t treating affs fairly). So if people in that position can be stupid enough to do the things we all know have been done, then it is not out of the realm of reason to think that there might be an ego at Iglobal that thinks they can have their cake and eat it too.
The biggest reason I always think PP is suspect, is that I can go into a different pokerroom and last much, much longer, or even come out a winner, than has been my experience at PP. And its a big difference.
If mr Yook is around anywhere, he’ll tell you the kind of commissions he makes off the rakes I pay at Intercasino, which is as good of proof as any that I DO do pretty well at IC’s poker room.
yet I cannot come close to such results at PP.
I suppose it could be just a streak of bad luck, but I sure do better elsewhere than at Party.