Originally posted by Janet
such is life, you win some and you lose someall the casinos I know of are working the same, but the issue is not download but install, when the customer installs a client that he downloaded from your site it is YOUR client for life
I think it is just fair, sure you win some and you lose some but I think it even’s out at the end
/Janet
I am not sure what you mean but we are not gambling here with the affiliate program. The program should be straightforward and done with the correct business ethics. Each casino (aspinalls, grand online, golden palace, flamingo, gold nugget) should be treated as a seperate entity and not just one because after all they are seperate casinos. It is not fair that if you are on the CPA model, you will only get credit for one signup even though a person downloads and deposits money into each of those casinos. Each of those casinos are promoted seperatly and they each have their own seperate website so in turn if a customer deposits money into each of those casinos, the referring affiliate should get credit for each of those casinos and not just one.
Sure if you are on the Revenue Share program its all good because if you were the first person to refer someone to ANY of those casinos then you would get credit for all 5 of them even though the customer found out about the other casinos on another website. But lets get real, Golden Palace is so well known and their marketing tactics are out there. There is no doubt in my mind that tens of thousands of people have already in some point downloaded and installed Golden Palace. What that means is that if they went to your site and decided to play at Aspinalls or any of the other 4 casinos, you would not get credit because they’ve already registered at Golden Palace and all 5 casinos are treated as one. Do you see where I’m getting with this?