I think the lessons that can be learned here are:
a: The test was inaccurate and it is unfair to judge rome or the founders based on this report. It was flawed and it needs to be put to rest.
b: Something needs to be done to ensure reports are accurate from hereonforth.
c: The stats at Rome could be improved to show more transparency so that affiliates are not confused. Casinorewards and wagershare have the best stats in the industry and I would look there for ideas. This is not to say the stats are not accurate, but more info would help build trust.
To summarize I don’t think we can judge Rome on this and I publicaly apologize if my earlier post in another thread gave the impression that I don’t trust them. I did state that they have one of the best conversion rates that I have seen anywhere and this has not changed. I think Josh is one of the more honest guys in this industry and I am glad to hear that the report was flawed versus the alternative.