@PatriciaRome 181184 wrote:
When a Casino is sold, closed, or absorbed by another Casino, the affiliate generally loses out unfortunately.
That depends on who licences the software. If it’s a Microgaming casino they have generally proved that they ensure any buy-out includes liabilities. A direct failure may be a different issue although with MG that’s unlikely as the brands are strong enough normally to ensure the casinos will be bought. When CPS went under, MG were quick to assure the media that liabilities would be a priority.
Although I am not aware of this happening, I would imagine Wagerworks and possibly Cryptologic would apply a similar principle. This is part of the reason why I think it’s important for affiliates to look at a) the brand strength and b) who provides the licences to the casinos they represent to underwrite some of the risk.