Oh now here’s something else to RA’s side on this. Before many of you were aware of this matter … you were pretty happy with RA, is that correct?
Happy enough that you list them in any case … I think that’s fair to say?
Okay … keeping in mind that everything you want … is something that I want … so don’t lynch me … but somewhere along the way they managed to keep you happy with the current terms … bottom line-wise … if not then that too would be your fault for listing them because everyone knows I am strongly voiced about not listing programs that don’t perform.
so I assume they kept you happy before you became aware …
then now you’ve caught up with me. What are your decisions about them after weighing the fact that even with the terms you now find unattractive … but when unaware … they were attractive ….
do you do?
If I had thought for a minute that many affluent affs were unaware I’d maybe have lobbied for change a bit harder … but this seemed an accepted … non-term shall i term it? an accepted non-term in their T&Cs. They never claimed to track them over. Was simple to me. take it or leave it.
Despite that .. I have never been sorry.
Times are changing however and it would be great if they’d perhaps consider a change on this matter as it would surely send them over the top as arguably being the best casino aff program in the industry … all-time.