Of course I can not know this, but I think it is highly unlikely because I see zero of those things in any other stats of mine. I have not personally set anyone to play and I never use my own links for my personal play of course.
The exact time gap was 5 days after the moment I first saw that I am not able to login to my affiliate account, to the moment I received response to my email when I asked about the login problem of my affiliate account. But I am afraid that this time gap would have been much longer if I personally would have not contacted them – Actually I am afraid that they would have never contacted me. And this I consider bad business practice like Stupid does also.
I understand that this site is not Casinomeister but CAP, but when the first mentioned is “Player´s guard dog in online gambling” and the latter is “Affiliate´s guard dog in online gambling”, then in my opinion these two sites should co-operate and use same kind of definitions for the word fraud for example. At the moment Casinomeister is much bigger site than CAP, so what I have understood the Casinomeister´s definitions are taken as industry standards. I find he´s definitions good and so do most of the other members there.
But this fraud stuff is now going very off-topic at the moment like Stupid mentioned so I think it is better idea to discuss about those other things in completely another thread and let this thread go to archives, when the point of this thread about communication between casino affiliate programs and it´s affiliates is already addressed(?) (at least agreed) by veteran users and moderators here and I hope casino affiliate programs start to use these better business practices in general in their communication processes in the future.