Good rant mate – but ill directed.
Publically listed companies have little choice but to comply with the UIGEA, and you need to be placing the blame closer to home in the US Government.
The whole US sportsbetting thing is too murky now – and only privately owned Costa Rican books seem prepared to take it on now. And probably only because they can hide ?
As far as the discussion on “clicks” – well that’s just me flying a kite – as I believe that this would cover 99.95% of active affiliates and effectively remove a predatory clause.
Isn’t that the whole point of the discussion ?
Seriously – if you’re not delivering ANY clicks then you are not a normal active affiliate – although perhaps you could operate “below the water” with email?
That’s why I asked for clarification on that use of MAY – perhaps discussions you can come to other agreements?
================
Outside the US of A ….
There are plenty of options for European, British, Asian, Canadian players and affiliates … through the whole range :
– all the credit cards,
– UK debit cards,
– Neteller,
– Moneybookers (etc) …
So there is plenty of banking in place – although these days it’s easier to send money to russia and China than the USA ?
:plain: