opiemarket wrote:
I’ll go back to what the professor said….what benefit would it be to anyone to pursue such a campaign right now.
Which fire are we trying to fuel?
What would be the purpose of this negative PR campaign?
Which fire are we trying to fuel?
What would be the purpose of this negative PR campaign?
Sorry…Does it help anyone here that Google is exposed and the traditional media spin another negative story about “online gambling” and “online advertising”.? :grunt:
You are basically sending a message to Joe Schmo Public that Google (according to the US Government) is still accepting “illegal advertising” for “illegal offshore gambling properties”. That will be the angle of the story that will be picked up by the media. The other story regarding Google “picks & chooses” how they accept their ads has NO Impact, and therefore that story will not run….do you really think the average consumer understands how PPC advertising works?
I think you misread my quoted message, I am agreeing NOT to pursue with the news 