To make it clear we are not putting the incentive cost on affiliates. We are offering 40-50% from gross rake to our affiliates.
If you take 20% rake back and 30% of the net rake to the affiliate( I think this is the best Superior offer- the room that seem to be your favourite room) you will earn 44% of the gross. That is below our average affiliate earn and also small/average players are not stimulated with rake back there or only 10%.
Also the retention for high rakers due to high stakes games is not comparable with their room and the fact the player can check and cash out anytime the rake is also an advantage.
I agree on the fact that the only good way to promote us is rake back but affiliates can easy keep 30% of the net rake that seem to be the market average and in same time offer an attractive incentive to players.
It makes for a lose-lose situation – either the room caves in and moves the player from the rightful affiliate’s account under the rake back aff (in effect facilitating theft), or the room loses the player.
What do you think the room will do here?
I don’t think is a good idea to afirm that the rake back rooms are going to steal your players especially in our case where you have live access to player statistics(no personal details offered just account numbers).
Is there any less risk on player theft from a non rake back room?