Originally posted by Mr. casino
Well, suppose a player wins $10,000 on the last day of them month, putting you at a negative balance. It gets wiped clean, and then on the 1st of the next month, he loses it all. According to the casinos i have asked about this scenario, they say that you will be paid your share in the second month regardless.I stress the “THEY SAY” part.
In this example, I cant see a casino being ok with this for very long.
Example: 45% plan
You have a big winner that hits a jackpot of 10,000 – which puts you in the red. If that negative were carried over and the player lost 5000 the following month you would still be 5000 in the hole.
If the negative was not carried over you would make $2250 if the player lost back half the next month.
This is why some programs utilize negative carry overs. They dont want to payout 10,000 – then turn around and pay you 2250 the following month when the player loses 5000. The casino would then be losing as they see it – a total of 7250 (5000 to the player and 2250 to the affiliate.)
When you think about the scale of things – paying the affiliate a percentage is the best choice! Considering that scale – I would surmise that programs using carry overs are not that big, are having financial problems, or are just freaking greedy!
:cheers: :sheers: :cheers:
Drink up boyxz